Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (12) TMI 1040

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at appellants were rendering construction of residential complex in respect of Golden Country Project at Maraimalai Nagar, Kanchipuram District concerning 240 flats in Phase-I. It also appeared that they were engaged in providing site formation and clearance service with respect to their real estate projects at Silver County, Platinum County and other projects. Department took the view that appellants had not paid appropriate service tax; not filed periodical ST-3 returns in respect of the said services provided by them. Hence a show cause notice dt. 29.07.2010 was issued inter alia, demanding service tax liability of Rs. 1,36,61,900/- in respect of construction residential complex service for the period 2006-07 to 2008-09 and Rs. 31,16,246....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 913 (SC). The Apex Court observed that in as much as Section 67 of the Finance Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), dealing with valuation of taxable services, refers to the gross amount charged for service, the service of RCS would cover only pure service activity as any contrary view would imply that the union government can levy service tax on the gross amount, including the value of transfer of property in goods also, which is constitutionally impermissible. The Hon'ble Apex Court also held that it was only with the introduction of Works Contract Service (WCS) as a separate taxable service with effect from 01.06.2007, the statutory mechanism to exclude the value of transfer of property in goods has been prescribed. Therefore, in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....esaid figures i.e. Rs. 1,9,89,740/- and Rs. 47,00,000/- are nothing but income from sale of UDS. (v) The sum of Rs. 2,38,89,740/- (total) received by the Appellant has been spent on the expenses incurred on the land prior to sale. These expenses include expenses such as site filling and other site preparatory expenses. The amount of Rs. 2,90,76,680/- has been spent towards land development expense towards land development prior to the sale of approved plots. (vi) Though an amount of Rs. 2,38,89,740/- has been accounted separately as land development expense, the transaction in substance is a sale and only for accounting purpose it was accounted separately. i.e. part of it as sale of Land and part of it as land development income and t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e formation and clearance service has been provided by the assessee to the buyers of flats and consideration towards the said activity has also been collected from the buyers. 4. Heard both sides and have gone through the facts. 6.1 With respect to the demand under construction service, the period involved is 2006-2009. It is not disputed that the appellants entered into an composite works contract involving both provision of service and supply of materials for providing the above service. This being so, the Ld. Advocate is correct in her assertion that as per the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (supra) and the decision of this very Bench in the case Real Value Promoters (supra), the said....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd clearance activity has taken place before they effected sale of land. Ostensibly, such activity would have been done by the appellants to enhance the saleability quotient of the land in question. It clearly appears to reason that a piece of land where site formation and clearing activity has already been carried out, the plotting of the land with various parcels will naturally fetch higher price for the land. This being so, the site formation and clearance activity has obviously been done by the appellant by themselves, for themselves. Further neither the agreement for sale had not seen light of the day, nor were the buyers visible on the horizon, at the time when the site formation etc of the land was carried out by the appellant. 6.....