Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (8) TMI 1410

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed his return of income declaring income of Rs. 99500/- on 29.03.2007. As per information received by the AO from CIB it was found that the Assessee has deposited a sum of Rs. 4172853/- in bank account No. 20010462 and bank account No. 20013626 with Bank of Baroda and Kisan Credit Card No. 55225. This also included a sum of unexplained cheque deposits in the bank account. On account of non furnishing of proper explanation Ld. Assessing Officer made addition on this account considering peak of one bank account and unexplained cheque deposits of Rs. 2190527/- vide order dated 7.10.2009. The matter was carried by the Assessee before the ld CIT(A), who consequently, confirmed above addition. Before ITAT also the addition was confirmed vide orde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rther relied on the orders of the lower authorities and submitted that where the Assessee did not provide any evidence about the nature and source of amount received then in absence of any explanation it is considered as amounting to concealment of income. He relied on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of CIT Vs. Mak data 358 ITR 593 (SC). In view of this he submitted that penalty levied may be confirmed. 5. We have carefully considered the rival contentions. The Assessee is found have been depositing money into his bank account in cash as well as cheque for which the Assessee could not given adequate explanation and therefore such sum was found to be undisclosed income of the Assessee. Further, the Assessee did not give ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ucted on 16.12.2003, in the case of a sister concern of the assessee. The survey was conducted more than 10 months before the assessee filed its return of income. Had it been the intention of the assessee to make full and true disclosure of its income, it would have filed the return declaring an income inclusive of the amount which was surrendered later during the course of the assessment proceedings. Consequently, it is clear that the assessee had no intention to declare its true income. It is the statutory duty of the assessee to record all its transactions in the books of account, to explain the source of payments made by it and to declare its true income in the return of income filed by it from year to year. The AO, in our view, has rec....