2018 (12) TMI 482
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f accounts, is that they carry on job works of sawing and this turnover was not taxable. The Assessing Officer [for brevity "AO"], however, while completing the assessment, took the entire turnover for sawing shown in the books of accounts as taxable turnover relying on Section 2(xliv) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 [for brevity "KVAT Act"]. Though the proposal was to take the entire turnover of sawing as taxable turnover, on further verification of the books of accounts; the amounts shown as labour charges were deleted. While the proposal was to add a turnover of Rs. 18,80,880/- in the first year and Rs. 20,44,380/- in the second year, the actual turnover added back was Rs. 8,90,960/- and Rs. 10,29,660/- in the respective years. T....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he records would reveal that the sawing carried on by the assessee were not of 'padumaram' alone. In fact, it specifically deals with 'pincoda' wood also. A specific invoice was shown from the records, at page 181, wherein pincoda logs sawing charges was billed. It is also submitted that the assessee had not been showing the entire sale price in the invoice and had been collecting consideration for goods as sawing charges from its customers. 4. We do not see any examination of records or facts by the first appellate authority. The first appellate authority merely stated that "the further case of the appellant that he deals only with timber like pincoda etc is also found correct as per his books of accounts. Since the sawing....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....elation to any goods received from any other person, he shall keep accounts showing the particulars of the goods received from such other person nature of job works undertaken, the quantity and nature of the goods returned and the date of return". 6. The learned Counsel appearing for the assessee would argue that there is no mandate as per the rule to obtain complete name and address of the supplier of goods who entrusts such goods for job works. To buttress such contention, it is submitted that Section 40A(2) on the contrary mandates the complete address in an invoice issued in a taxable sale. We do not, understand how a specific mandate in a provision could be deemed to be an exclusion of such requirement in all other provisions. The co....