Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1999 (4) TMI 40

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ted April 17, 1995, passed by the XIIIth Additional Sessions Judge, Indore, in Criminal Appeal No. 78 of 1993, whereby the conviction of the petitioners under section 276E read with section 278B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for brevity, hereinafter the "Act"), has been maintained and they have been imposed a fine of Rs. 5,000 each with imprisonment till rising of the court. The respondent herein ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lso placed reliance on a judgment of the learned single judge of this court, reported in Harikishan v. Union of India [1996] 217 ITR 582, in which, it has been clearly held that prosecution launched for commission of an offence under section 276E of the Act after April 1, 1989, would not be maintainable. Learned counsel for the respondent, was not able to show any contrary view to this court. Eve....