2017 (12) TMI 1638
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed by the assessee against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), Shimla [hereinafter referred to as 'CIT(Appeals)'] dated 25.04.2017 relating to assessment year 2013-14. 2. Grounds raised by the assessee read as under: 1. The Ld. CIT(A) is wrong in disallowing the benefit of substantial expansion u/s 80IC(2) and confirming the deduction....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s pointed out that the Hon'ble High Court had decided the issue in favour of the assessee, holding that there is no bar in the said section denying the benefit of hundred percent deduction to new units undertaking substantial expansion. Our attention was drawn to the relevant conclusions of the Hon'ble High Court in this regard at para 55 of the orde....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....be entitled to benefit of deduction at different rates of percentage stipulated under Section 80-IC. (c) Substantial expansion cannot be confined to one expansion. As long as requirement of Section 80-IC(8)(ix) is met, there can be number of multiple substantial expansions. (d) Correspondingly, there can be more than one initial Assessment Years. (e) Wi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er the assessee has actually carried out the substantial expansion to be entitled to claim deduction u/s 80IC of the Act. 5. We do not agree to the above contention raised by the Revenue at this stage. A perusal of the order of the Assessing officer reveals that the Assessing officer has not disputed that the assessee unit has carried out substantial &nb....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI