Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (11) TMI 1445

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(C&F) Service; (iv) Rent-a-cab Service; and (v) Port Service 2. Today when the matter came up for hearing, Ld. Advocate Ms. S. Sridevi appeared on behalf of the assessee and Ld. AC (AR) Shri. R. Subramaniyan appeared on behalf of the Revenue. 3. During the course of hearing, Ld. Advocate submitted that the appeal relates to the period April, 2007 to March, 2011 which is prior to the amendment dated 01.04.2011. She further submitted that the issue stands covered in their favour by the following Orders : * M/s. Diamond Engineering (Chennai) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. C.C.E., Chennai-IV - 2017 (7) T.M.I. 710 - CESTAT Chennai; * C.C.E., Trichy Vs. M/s. Madras Cements Ltd. & vice versa -2018 (5) T.M.I. 411 - CESTAT Chennai; * M/s. Hindustan Natio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt entry. In such a scenario, the interest liability would not arise. For such proposition, she relies upon the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court's decision in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Bangalore Vs Bill Forge Ltd., reported in 2012 (279) E.L.T. 209 (Kar.) as also the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai Vs Strategic Engineering (P) Ltd. reported in 2014 (310) E.L.T. 509 (Mad.). However, learned advocate fairly admits that there is another decision of the Madras High Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai Vs Delphi TVS Diesel Systems Ltd. reported in 2015 (322)E.L.T.279 (Mad.) laying down that even if the credit initially taken was reversed befor....