Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (11) TMI 1386

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ri Shiv Pratap Singh (Dy. Commr.) AR for Revenue Shri Vineet Kumar Singh (Advocate) for Assessee ORDER Per: Archana Wadhwa As per facts on record, the appellant is registered with the Service Tax Department for providing services under the category of servicing of motor vehicle and Renting of Immovable Property. They were receiving certain amounts from M/s Maruti Udyog Ltd. on account of e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....em by various decisions of the Tribunal. Accordingly, he upheld the confirmation of demand of service tax. However, appreciating that the appellant has already deposited an amount of Rs. 18,81,782/-, he reduced the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, to the balance amount of Rs. 19,99,217/-. He further observed that as the appellant was regularly filing ST-3 returns there was no reason to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unal in the cases of Chambal Motors Pvt. Ltd. (2008), TIOL-1277, City Motors & Financial Services (2012), TIOL-578 another case reported in 2013 TIOL-1436 and EMPEE Motors Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE, Chandigarh vide Final Order No.ST/412/2011 (PB) dated 28.08.2011 and many others. Therefore, the appellant has no case on merit at all." 5. As is seen from the above, the issue stands decided against the ass....