2018 (11) TMI 1372

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....te For the Appellant Mr. Gopakumar, AR For the Respondent ORDER Per: S.S GARG Appellants have filed these two appeals directed against the impugned order dated 5.2.2018 passed by the Commissioner (A) whereby the Commissioner (A) has upheld the Order-in-Original by upholding the demand of interest and increased the penalty in the departmental appeal from Rs. 5,000/- to Rs. 1,79,190/-. B....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nal dated 28.12.2016 confirmed the demand of Rs. 17,91,902/- along with interest amounting to Rs. 65,635/- under Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules (CCR), 2004 and appropriated an amount of Rs. 17,91,902/- already reversed by the appellant towards the CENVAT credit confirmed. Further, he also imposed a penalty of Rs. 5,000/- on the appellant under Rule 15(1) of CCR, 2004. Aggrieved by the said order, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ccount of bona fide mistake. He further submitted that the credit so availed was not utilized and the same remained as a book entry in the record. He further submitted that there was sufficient balance in their CENVAT account during the relevant period and the same has been shown in their returns during the material period. He further submitted that once the appellants have reversed the CENVAT cre....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mistake, the appellants have taken 100% CENVAT credit in the first year whereas they were entitled to take CENVAT credit up to 50% but as soon as they realized their mistake, they reversed the 50% before the issuance of show-cause notice. Further, I find that they had sufficient balance in their CENVAT credit account and therefore, they have not utilized the said CENVAT credit and it was merely a ....