2018 (11) TMI 1364
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pellant Mr. N. Jagadish, Superintendent (AR) For the Respondent ORDER Per: S.S GARG The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 16/04/2004/19/04/2004 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the Commissioner (Appeals) has classified the body built on duty paid chassis by the appellant under Chapter 87.07 of Central Excise Tariff. Briefly the facts of the present....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t sustainable in law as the same has been passed without considering the judicial precedents and without properly appreciating the facts of the case. He further submitted that this Tribunal for the earlier period in the appellant's own case which is reported in 2007 (216) E.L.T. 69, the Tribunal also classified the bodies built on chassis under Chapter Heading 87.07 of Central Excise Tariff. Aggri....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....se for the earlier period, appeal is pending before the Apex Court and absolute stay has been granted in favour of the appellant. Therefore, in that situation till the matter is finally resolved by the Apex Court, Tribunal may not proceed with the disposal of the present appeal. 4. On the other hand the learned AR appearing for the Revenue has clearly admitted that the appeal in the appellant's....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI