2018 (11) TMI 1279

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Mr. R.K. Verma, Advocate Present for the Respondent: Mr. P.R. Gupta, D.R. ORDER PER: RACHNA GUPTA Arguments on the application praying for rectification of mistake by recalling Final Order 52354/2018 dated 29.06.2018 in terms of Section 35 C (2) of Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Rule 41 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, heard. 2. It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that vi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....challenge. Due to said observation, the matter was remanded back. Impressing upon that there is no error apparent as alleged, application is prayed to be dismissed. 4. After hearing both the parties, the considered opinion of mine is that the ambit of the rectification is for a very limited purpose of correcting the mistakes, which are clerical or typographical or arithmetical in nature. In add....