Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (11) TMI 1116

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to as 'Act'] for the AY. 2010-11 vide his order dated 22-03-2013. 2. The only issue in this appeal of Revenue is against the order of CIT(A), deleting the addition made by the AO in respect to difference between AIR details and the transactions disclosed in the income tax returns. For this, Revenue has raised the following five grounds of appeal: "1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld.CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 1,38,55,010/- made by the AO. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld.CIT(A) failed to consider the fact that the assessee in his statement recorded u/s. 131 of the Act on 11.03.2013 during assessment proceedings admitted that 11 residential ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gistered by Registered Agreements for sale in the FY. 2009- 10 relevant to the AY. 2010-11, which amply justifies the fact that more than 80% of the project was completed in FY. 2009-10 relevant to AY. 2010-11 and sale consideration has been received and sale agreements have been registered in this year itself, thus proportionate profit should have been offered to tax in view of the decision of Tribunal in the case of Champion Construction Co. Vs. First ITO 1983 (5 ITD 495) (Mum) wherein it was held that when 80% of work is completed, proportionate profit must be charged to tax. 6. The appellant prays that the order of Ld.CIT(A) on the above grounds be set aside and that of the Assessing Officer be restored. 7. The appellant craves leav....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of income filed by the appellant for the AY. 2011-12 along with the copy of the audited annual accounts; iv. Copy of the part occupation certificate; v. Copies of the ledger accounts of the parties as appearing in the books of the assessee for the AY. 2009-10 and FY. 2010-11; 4.1. The CIT(A) after considering the remand report and additional evidences, noted that the addition made by the AO u/s. 56(2)(vii) of the Act and also alternatively u/s. 28(2)(iv) of the Act, these being advances are not business income or income from other sources. He also noticed that these are merely advances and assessee has disclosed the income on project completion basis in AY 2011-12 out of the total receipts of this 'Harmony' project. According to CIT(A)....