Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New Feature Launched βœ•

Introducing the β€œIn Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.

  • βš–οΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
  • πŸ” Narrow down results with higher precision

Try it now in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (2) TMI 1797

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....val, Superintendent (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : V. Padmanabhan, Member (T)]. - The present miscellaneous application along with appeal has been filed against the Order-in-Original No. 51/2015-16, dated 11-2-2016. Vide the above impugned order, the adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of around Rs. 2.78 crores (Rupees Two Crore Seventy-Eight Lakhs approximately) of Customs....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the contention and submitted that the Director being a separate legal entity against whom penalty has been imposed, is required to make separate pre-deposit in terms of Section 35F which cannot be waived. 3. After considering the submissions made by both sides and on perusal of record, we find that under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, payment of deposit at the rate of 7.5% of the de....