2018 (11) TMI 413

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... AR ORDER Per: Mr. Ashok Jindal The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has remanded the matter back to the adjudicating authority to follow the principal of natural justice. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant is an 100% EOU and availing cenvat credit on inputs and input services after exporting the goods certain a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t the appellant has filed refund claim of accumulated cenvat credit in their cenvat credit account being 100% EOU under Rule 5 of CCR, 2004. The appellant was availing cenvat credit on inputs and input services and filing their regular returns showing the admissibility of the cenvat credit of inputs and input services in question. No rejection of cenvat credit on inputs and input services was rais....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s admitted the position that no show cause notice has been issued to the appellant either for denial of cenvat credit on inputs and input services or for rejection of refund claim. After adjudication, the revenue cannot take law in their hand to issue the show cause notice by invoking extended period of limitation. Therefore, understanding by law by departmental officer is misconceived. Admittedly....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... denied merely on the premise that services in question on which cenvat credit remained unutilized in cenvat credit are not 'Input Services'. In view of the above analysis, I hold that appellants are entitled for refund claim filed under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. In the result, the impugned orders are set aside and the appeals are allowed with consequential relief, if any." In that c....