2018 (11) TMI 358
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Shri Rajeev Ranjan (Addl. Commr.) AR for Respondent ORDER Per: Anil G. Shakkarwar The present appeal is arising out of impugned Order-in-Original dated 13.01.2015 through which service tax of Rs. 57,03,101/- was confirmed under Section 73 of Finance Act, 1994. The appellant is also imposed with various penalties. Aggrieved by the said order appellant is before this Tribunal. 2. Brief fact....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ice was issued on 14.10.2013. The said show cause notice was on contest adjudicated through impugned order. Aggrieved by the said order appellant is before this Tribunal. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. He has submitted certified copy of the statement of Income as certified by Chartered Accountant wherein the Chartered Accountant has certified that the income to the appellant was ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ome mention of collection of service tax by the appellant from the customers in the show cause notice whereas the fact is that the customers of the appellant informed the appellant that the activity did not attract service tax and did not pay service tax to the appellant. He further argued that even for the sake of argument it is accepted that service tax was recovered by the appellant even in tha....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI