Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1967 (10) TMI 73

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ided family of which Shri M. D. Dhanwatey is the karta. The assessment year involved in this appeal is 1954-55, the corresponding accounting year being the year ended September 30, 1953. Shri M.D. Dhanwatey was a partner in the partnership firm carrying on business under the name and style of M/s. Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works. The share capital of Shri M.D. Dhanwatey was entirely contributed by the assessee Hindu undivided family. The rights of the partners were governed at the relevant time by a partnership agreement dated April 1, 1951. According to the agreement the partnership was of lithography and art printing and was carried on by means of a press under the name and style of "Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works". Clause (4) of the partnersh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....turn. It was contended that the salary received by Shri M.D. Dhanwatey, the karta of the assessee-family was received by him in his individual capacity and that it was not taxable in the hands of the assessee. The Income-tax Officer, Special Investigation Circle "B", Nagpur, by his assessment order dated May 28, 1955, negatived the contention of the assessee. The assessee took the matter to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner but the appeal was dismissed. The assessee preferred a further appeal to the Appellate Tribunal which rejected the contention of the assessee that the amount of Rs. 7,500 was earned by Shri M.D. Dhanwatey in his individual capacity and that it should not have been included in the taxable income of the assessee. As dir....