2018 (11) TMI 213
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ATH SRI.T.T.BIJU For The RESPONDENT : SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL JUDGMENT The petitioner, a trader, transported natural rubber. After generating e-way bill, she sent a consignment to Uttarakhand, with all the relevant records. But it was seized by the State Tax Officer, Uttarakhand, the additional 11th respondent. The ground for detention is that in the e-way bill the dis....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... He also submits that there is no provision in the Rules for such correction, either. 3. That apart, the learned Standing Counsel submits that a certificate, as sought by the petitioner from the 7th respondent, is also not possible because the Authority has no such power conferred on him. At any rate, he too felt that the mistake is genuine, evident, and needs correction, in the interest of ju....
TaxTMI