Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (11) TMI 183

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Section 35 G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (the Act) challenges the order dated 30th May, 2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). 2. Mr. Walve, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue urges only the following reframed question of law for our consideration : Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the service tax on services rendered to entities abroad as Export of Services Rules 2005 would be applicable in the facts of this case. 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Customs rejected the refund claim filed by the respondents. On appeal, the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) by an order dated 12th July, 2013 held that the services rendered by the appellant are business auxiliary services....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l appearing for the appellant in support of the appeal submits that the decision of the Tribunal in Paul Merchant Ltd. (supra) is a subject matter of challenge before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. The appellant's challenge to the order of the Tribunal in Paul Merchant Ltd. (supra) has been admitted. Thus, it is submitted that this appeal would require admission. 7. We find that the is....