Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (11) TMI 73

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... AR for Respondent ORDER Per: Archana Wadhwa On matter being called nobody appeared. Accordingly, we have heard the learned AR and have gone through the impugned orders. 2. As per facts on record appellant is engaged in the manufacture of MS Tubes and Pipes falling under Chapter 73 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The dispute in the present appeal relates to av....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellant, we proceed to decide the appeal itself in respect of remanding the matter to Commissioner (Appeals). 4. As regards the availability of Cenvat Credit in respect welding electrodes, the issue stands settled by various decisions of the High Courts. The same stands followed by the Tribunal in the case of Kisan Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-II reported at....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....epartments, who insist on further inspection of the goods that the said inspection is being undertaken and inspection charges are being recovered by the appellant from their customers on actual basis. Tribunal in the case of Classic Polytubes Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of C. EX., Lucknow reported at 2016 (336) ELT 180 (Tri. All.) has held that such inspection is not mandatory and is undertaken at....