Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1925 (9) TMI 1

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....his own share and that of each of the sons inter se. Both the lower Courts held that he had power to effect such a complete partition and agreed that ' it had been acted upon inter se by the sons of the younger wife Tai. The lower appellate Court held that it had also been acted upon inter se by the appellant and his brothers, the sons of his elder wife Yesa. In appeal it is contended for the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tance would not justify us, in the face of the other evidence, in allowing the finding of the lower appellate Court to be questioned. But as a matter of fact the sons of Yesa inter se had also acted upon the partition and had enjoyed the property separately. The appellant Bapu had in a previous litigation himself admitted the partition inter ae among the sons of Yesa and had based his claim upon i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....asami v. Doraisami Ayyar (1880) I.L.R. 2 Mad. 317 a case which resembles the present, that the father with two wives effecting a partition among the sons and himself had the power for which the respondents contend. That such a power may exist appears to be implicitly conceded in the decision of their lordahips of the Privy Council in Ramkishore Kedarnath v. Jainarayan Ramrachhpal (1913) I.L.R. 40 ....