2018 (10) TMI 1255

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r (AR) for respondent ORDER Per: S.K. Mohanty This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 22.03.2018 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) Service Tax, Mumbai. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in the business of providing taxable services under the category of "storage and warehousing service", "repair and maintenance", "cargo handling", defined ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....77 and 78 of the Act. On appeal, the Learned Commissioner (Appeals) vide the impugned order dated 22.03.2018 has upheld the adjudged demand confirmed on the appellant. 3. The Learned Advocate appearing for the appellant submit that during the disputed period, the appellant had deposited the service tax in respect of the services provided by it including the GTA service under reverse charge mech....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....reiterated the findings recorded in the impugned order. 5. Heard both sides and perused the records. 6. On perusal of adjudication order dated 06.02.2014, I find that vide paragraph 17 and 18 therein, it has been stated that apart from providing the taxable service under the category of storage and warehousing, the appellant was also required to pay service tax on GTA service under reverse c....