Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (11) TMI 30

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ct of properties which he asserts belong to him, having been acquired from his grandfather and his mother. The sale was for the purposes of recovery of the arrears of tax due from his father. The Revenue had attached those properties on October 27, 1974, and had also issued a notice under rule 2 of Schedule II. The proclamation of sale, however, was issued only in the month of March, 1996. The pet....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er having issued the proclamation and not having proceeded with the sale, despite no impediment having been placed, no fresh proclamation can now be issued in view of rule 68B, sub-rule (3) of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act. Rule 68B(3) reads thus : Where any immovable property has been attached under this Part before the first day of June, 1992, and the order giving rise to a demand of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ave been vacated on the expiry of the time of limitation specified under this rule. Though the proclamation of sale was issued prior to March 31, 1996, the sale not having been held pursuant to the proclamation, despite the absence of any order of the court, which prevented the sale being held, no fresh proclamation can now be issued, as none of the circumstances visualized in the proviso to ru....