Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (10) TMI 819

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondent ORDER Per: S.K. Mohanty This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 26.03.2018 passed by learned Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise, Pune. 2. Denial of Cenvat Credit on courier service utilized for delivery of goods at the buyer's premises, is the subject matter of present dispute. The authorities below have denied the Cenvat Credit, holding that place of remova....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nue reiterated the findings recorded in the impugned order and further relied on judgment dated 01.02.2018 of Hon'ble Supreme Court delivered in the case of Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. (Civil appeal no. 11261 of 2016), to state that courier service utilized by the appellant for removal of goods beyond the place of removal should not be admissible for the Cenvat benefit. 5. Heard both sides and perus....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ized, no interest shall be demanded from the appellant. Further, it is not a case that taking of regular credit by the appellant is owing to the reason of fraud, collusion, suppression of facts etc., with intent to defraud the Government revenue. Since the appellant had availed the credit based on the earlier circular issued by the CBEC, it cannot be said that the appellant had indulged into the f....