Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1982 (3) TMI 277

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r to assuage the feeling of his daughter-in-law and convenience in cultivation he permitted Rajpal Singh and Kayam Singh the two brothers of daughter-in-law to live with him but they appeared to have lost their patience soon and started ill-treating the appellant and even beating him which forced him to abandon his own house and live with Basudeo Singh his nephew and Kunwar Pal his grandnephew son....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l the entire land and deprive himself of means of his livelihood. He further found that the consideration was grossly inadequate and the circumstances in which the sale deed was executed were suspicious. The finding was reversed in appeal as the son of appellant died two years prior to the execution of the sale deed and in the statement recorded on 7-5-69 in mutation proceedings the appellant had ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....red in broad spectrum of undue influence particularly when the appellate court did not set aside the finding of trial court that sale deed was executed without any consideration. Learned counsel maintained that due to death of his son and behaviour of Rajpal and Kayam Singh the appellant was not in a position to exercise his independent will therefore the burden to prove that the deed was written ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re greatly amenable to overpowering influence of another person are induced to enter into conveyance and transactions relating to their property. 3. Unfortunately, for appellant the principle laid down in this decision does not come to his rescue. From evidence on record it is clear that appellant was aged only 56 years when he decided to part with his entire property in favour of his nephews. Th....