Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (10) TMI 808

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a Vohra, Advocate. SANJIV KHANNA, J. (ORAL): Revenue in this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short), which relates to Assessment Year 2003-2004 impugns the order dated 23rd March, 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in the case of Rambagh Palace Hotels Private Limited (respondent-assessee).  2. The appeal arises from ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ntiate genuineness of the expenditure and their statements were recorded on oath.  Documents were also produced by the said vendors. The Assessing Officer held that the respondent-assessee had been able to establish genuineness of the expenditure from the said four vendors amounting to Rs. 2,48,08,464/-. However, the respondent-assessee had not been able to produce confirmations or produce ot....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that the parties who had rendered the services were existing and genuine parties. At the same time the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) held that there could still be some doubt about the existence of the said contractors and hence 5% disallowance was justified.  5. Thereupon, cross appeals as noticed above were preferred by the Revenue and the respondent-assessee to the Tribunal.&nbs....