Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (10) TMI 520

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ly returns for the period December, 2008 to March, 2009, filed by the appellant, the authorities noticed that appellant had claimed benefit of Notification No. 63/95-CE dated 16.03.95 from duty exemption of the goods cleared. Appellants are manufacturers of Mobile communication Shelters Antennas etc. The claim of the appellant was found to be inconsistent with the provisions of notification hence correspondence was entered with appellant. Appellant claimed that they have not discharged the duty liability as the products which are manufactured and were cleared to BEL, which in turn after use in manufacture, supplied the machinery to Ministry of Defence. Show cause notice was issued for the demand of the duty liability on such inproper availm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....finished goods manufactured by them to Bharat Electronics Limited claiming the benefit of exemption Notification No. 63/95 dated 16.03.95. It is undisputed that the goods supplied by the appellant to BEL were used by them for further manufacturing activity and supplies to the defence purposes. It is the case of the appellant that such supplies also needs to be considered as supplied to Ministry of Defence; Revenue is holding it other way. 7. In order to come to a correct conclusion whether the said notification would apply to appellant's case or not. The said notification needs to be reproduced which is as under: Notification No. 63/1995- Central Excise, dated: March 16, 1995 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ectricals Limited. It can be seen from the above reproduced relevant portion of the notification, it exempts the goods supply to the Ministry of Defence for official purposes if they are manufactured by the entities/ PSU for supply to MOD. The said notification does not give any leverage to the suppliers by vendors to such entities as mentioned in notification. In our view, the benefit of the notification restricts the exemption only to units indicated in the above reproduced relevant portion of the notification. We find that the claim of the appellant in the case in hand is incorrect as to that they are eligible for the benefit of notification. 8. We find that the same view has been expressed by this Bench in the case of Astra Microw....