Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (10) TMI 984

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....td. towards Business Centre Facility and Administration Charges 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) further erred in confirming the disallowance of Rs. 1,65,707/- out of interest paid, on account of alleged interest-free loans given to the sister concerns. 3. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) further erred in confirming the disallowance of Rs. 1,62,16,245/- out of interest paid, on the ground that the same should be capitalized towards projects/plots/ premises". 2. Rival contentions have been heard and record perused. Facts in brief are that the assessee is engaged in the business of real estate development and construction. During the course of scrutiny assessment the AO observed that as ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing reasons for disallowances. The appeal against which was filed before CIT(A) which has been dismissed by the CIT(A) and we have filed appeal before ITAT which has been heard on 26.11.2010. The similar issue has been decided by ITAT in our sister concern case M/s.Tolaram & Co., for AY.2001-02 and Vazirani Land Dev. Pvt. Ltd., A Y.1999-2000. In view of the above, you are requested to please allow the expenses covered u/s.40A(2)(b) which are neither unreasonable nor excessive." However, the AO was not satisfied by the reply of assessee, therefore, made a disallowance of Rs.,30,000/- u/s.40A(2)(b). 3. By the impugned order, the CIT(A) confirmed the addition and assessee is in further appeal before us. 4. It was submit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....T(A)." We have carefully gone through the order of the Tribunal in assessee's case and found that on identical facts and circumstances, the similar addition made in earlier years were deleted by the Tribunal. We also found that payments made for business centre facility and administrative charges were not in excess of fair market value of similar services available in the market. Respectfully following the order of the Tribunal in assessee's own case for earlier years, we do not find any merit in the addition so made by the AO under Section 40A(2)(b) of the Act. Accordingly, we direct to delete the same. 6. The AO has also disallowed a sum of Rs. 1,65,707/- out of interest paid on account of alleged interest-free loans given to the si....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s.26,00,000/- Advance towards plot - Rs.4,32,38,015/- Closing stock of premises - Rs.8,09,73,546/- During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee was asked why the expenditure on interest should not be capitalized as assessee is in the business of construction activity and has made investment in plots, premises, loans and advances, closing stock of premises. In this regard assessee has made written submission which is reproduced hereunder: "Reasons for high amount of loans and utilization thereof During the year under consideration we have the interest bearing fund of Rs. 12,74, 00,800/-which has been utilized for the purpose of business as under: Advance towards plot Rs.4,32,38,015/- Advance towa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ound from the record that disallowance of interest of Rs. 1,65,707/- was made by the AO on the plea that interest bearing funds have been diverted for non-business purpose. We found that before the AO assessee has furnished full details of interest free funds available with it amounting to Rs. 10.22 crores out of which advance given to the sister concern was Rs. 6.99 crores. There is no dispute to the well settled proposition that if the interest bearing funds have been diverted for non-business purpose, disallowance is required to be made with respect to the interest expenditure attributable to such advances. However, where interest free funds have been utilized for advancing non-business purpose, no disallowance can be made. In the instan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on of the lower authorities as well as the contention of the learned DR insofar as interest expenditure was indirect expenditure which is required to be debited to the profit and loss account in the year of incurring of such expenses while computing the business income of the assessee. The issue is also covered by the decision of the ITAT Mumbai in the case of K. Raheja (P) Ltd., (2006) 102 ITD 414 (Mum), wherein it was observed that where the assessee was following completed contract method for recognizing its income/loss, but claimed finance cost in nature of interest as a period cost, the same is deductible in the year in which it was incurred or accrued. It was further observed that the Accounting Standard 7 issued by the ICAI, also sug....