Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2000 (6) TMI 9

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he facts giving rise to this appeal, briefly, are as follows : The assessee, during the previous year, relevant to the assessment year 1992-93, purchased premises in the building known as "Mahendra Towers" vide sale deed dated June 28, 1991. The said premises were let out to Raymond Woollen Mills Limited from October 1, 1991. The lessee agreed to deposit an amount as a security deposit for the due performance of the lease. The assessee was not to pay any interest on the security deposit to the lessees. The premises are covered by the provisions of the Bombay Rent Act, 1947. The Assessing Officer concluded that the annual value of the property under section 23(1)(b) was the sum total of the rent actually received by the assessee as lessor pl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t this judgment is based only on the facts of the present case. At the outset it may be mentioned that the Department has invoked section 23(1)(b) of the Act which is not in dispute. The Department has not invoked section 23(1)(a) of the Act, The property is covered by the provisions of the Bombay Rent Act. The Tribunal has given a finding of fact that the actual rent received by the assessee even without taking into account the notional interest was more than the annual letting value of the property determinable under section 23(1)(a) of the Act. It is in this factual background that we are required to consider the scope of section 23(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act. In the case of CIT v. Satya Co. Ltd. [1994] 75 Taxman 193, a Division Bench ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent which is known as the fair rent or standard rent under the rent control legislation. The provisions of section 23(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act apply both to owner-occupied property as also to property which is let out and the measure of valuation to decide the annual value is the standard rent or the fair rent. However, section 23(1)(b) only applies to cases where the actual rent received is more than the reasonable rent under section 23(1)(a) of the Act and it is for this reason that section 23(1)(b) contemplates that in such cases the annual value should be decided on the basis of the actual rent received. As stated hereinabove, in this case, the Department has invoked section 23(1)(b) which, as stated hereinabove, proceeds on the basi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eterminable under section 23(1)(a), then such higher actual annual rent would constitute the annual value of the property. It is important to bear in mind that under section 22, the measure of income from house property is its annual value. The annual value is to be decided in accordance with section 23(1). By virtue, of the amendment, clause (a) states that the annual value is the sum for which the property might reasonably be expected to be let from year to year whereas clause (b) covers a case where the property is let and the actual rent is in excess of the sum for which the property might reasonably be expected to be let from year to year. In our view, this later insertion of clause (b) by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975, is me....