Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (9) TMI 1287

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dvocate) for the Appellant (s) Shri Pawan Kumar Singh (Supdt.) (A.R.) for the Revenue ORDER Per Mrs. Archana Wadhwa : After hearing both sides we find that the appellant imported a consignment of Aluminium scrap classified as tough/taboo as per ISRI from M/s. Dubai Scrap Trading, Sharja, UAE and filed a Bill of Entry dated 14.06.2003 declaring the goods as scrap and the value of the same as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....otice culminated into an order passed by the original adjudicating authority enhancing the value and consequent differential duty of Rs. 87,043/-. Further the goods were also confiscated with an option to the appellant to redeem the same on payment of redemption fine of Rs. 3.50 lakhs and penalty of Rs. 50,000/- was imposed under section 112 of the Customs Act. The said order of the original adjud....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ld.Advocate has drawn our attention to various precedent decisions of the Tribunal, but we find that an identical case of the same assessee was dealt by the Tribunal in the case of Vardhaman Sales Agency and vide its Final Order No.70439-70440/2018 dated 10.01.1018, the charges of mis-declaration and the consequent enhancement of value were set aside by observing as under:- "Having considered the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is not sold consideration and if the buyers and sellers are related person then after establishing that the price is not sole consideration, the transaction value can be rejected and taking other evidences into consideration, the assessable value can be arrived at. We do not find any such exercise being undertaken in the present case for enhancement of value. We therefore set aside the impugned or....