2018 (9) TMI 747
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pnil Bangur, a/w Mr. J.B. Mishra, for the Respondent. ORDER : 1. By the consent of both the parties, the Appeal itself is being disposed of at the stage of admission. 2. This Appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short "the Act") challenges the order dated 30th March 2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short "the Tribunal"). ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t was working under the compounded levy scheme under Section 96ZH of the Rules and paying duty per machine/per shift on the length of machine under the Notification No. 211/82 CE dated 31st August 1982 and also additional duty at the rate of 15 percent of the basic duty of excise. It was found that although four machines were installed, it had debited central excise duty only on three machines, wh....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he Appellant filed an Appeal to the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). By the order dated 14th October 2008, the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) allowed the Respondent-Assessee's Appeal inter alia holding that the entire proceedings before the Joint Commissioner was without jurisdiction as it was contrary to the proviso of Section 11A of the Act, as it then existed. Thereafter,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....thority was to dispose of the Show Cause Notice by passing a fresh order. 9. We find that the impugned order of the Tribunal has not dealt with the findings rendered by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) that the order dated 30th May 2008 passed by the Joint Commissioner of Central Excise is without jurisdiction. This, as it is in defiance of the provisions of Section 11A of the Act whi....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI