Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2001 (4) TMI 79

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in law in upholding the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) by accepting the claim of exemption of Rs. 60,437 which the assessee received after the winding up of the superannuation scheme, when some of the conditions for exemption mentioned in section 10(13) was not fulfilled ?" In this case the asse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t, 1961. The relevant provision that is sub-clause (ii) of clause (3) of section 17 reads as under : "(ii) any payment other than any payment referred to in clause (10), clause (10A), clause (10B), clause (11), clause (12), clause (13) or clause (13A) of section 10, due to or received by an assessee from an employer or a former employer or from a provident or other fund (not being an approved sup....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt year is 1987-88, payment has been made out of an approved superannuation fund and the words "not being an approved superannuation fund" have been omitted with effect from April 1, 1996. The payment has been made from the approved superannuation fund and the words "not being an approved superannuation fund" were there in sub-clause (ii) during the assessment year 1987-88, there is no question t....