Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (9) TMI 558

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d that the duty should have been correctly paid on transaction value in terms of section 4. The original authority rejected the refund by order in original which was set aside by the Commissioner (A) by allowing the appeal of the appellant on the ground that the correct valuation has to be done under section 4 as the physician's samples were sold to the brand owner. The Revenue filed the present appeal. 2. Shri K.J. Kinariwala, Ld. Dy. Commr.(A.R.) appearing on behalf of Revenue reiterates the grounds of the appeal. He submits that the appellant had correctly paid the duty at the time of clearance under section 4 on the value which is proportionate to value arrived at valuation under section 4A. Therefore, there is no question of refund ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ice as required under the said DPCO, 1995, particularly rules 14 & 15 thereof. A perusal of Rule 14 & 15 of the DPCO, 1995, reveals that it is applicable only in respect of those goods which are intended for sale in retail. There is no dispute that, so far as the physician samples are concerned, they are not intended for retail sale and, printing the MRP on the said physician sample packs. 10. It, therefore, emerges that so far as the physician samples are concerned there is no law which requires them to print any MRP on them. Thus, the physician samples are concerned there is no law which requires them to print any MRP on them. Thus, the physician samples go out of the purview of Section 4A of Central Excise Act, 1944. 11. If section....