2018 (9) TMI 130

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R (JUDICIAL) Present for the Appellant: Mr. Deepak Vajpay, CA Present for the Respondent: Mr. Sanjay Jain, D.R. ORDER PER: RACHNA GUPTA Arguments on application for condonation of delay heard. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has submitted that the assessee M/s. Rai Enterprises was a proprietorship firm run by Shri Santosh Rai. The order in appeal dated 8^th May, 2014 said Shri Santosh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ut the fact remains is that the order was communicated well within time. There is no cogent reason to allow the condonation of delay. Application is prayed to be rejected. 3. After hearing both the sides and perusing the record, we are of the opinion that the order under challenge was announced on 18^th May, 2014. The assessee, the Proprietor thereof passed away on 3^rd November, 2016 i.e. afte....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... absence of any action on those letters is opined sufficient to not to extend any benefit in favour of the applicant. Perusal of record also shows that an observation of the original adjudicating authority in the order dated 23^rd December, 2011 highlighting the conduct of the then assessee observing that despite several communications and notices to the assessee/ deceased Santosh Rai he had been ....