2018 (9) TMI 89

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spondent: Mr. P. Juneja, D.R. ORDER PER: RACHNA GUPTA The appellant herein is engaged in providing taxable services of clearing and forwarding agents services, cargo handling services, transport of goods by road/goods transport agency services and storage and warehousing services as taxable under Section 65(105)(j), 65 (105)(zr), 65(105)(zzp) and 65(105)(zza) of the Finance Act, 1994 (the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....11/- instead of initial demand of Rs. 1,58,826/-. Similarly, amount of interest and penalty has also been reduced to Rs. 76,711/- each. Being aggrieved of the said Order, present Appeal has been filed. 2. I have heard Mr. Mudit Jain, CA for the appellant and Mr. P. Juneja, Ld. DR for the Department. 3. It is submitted on behalf of appellant that the appellant had not utilised the cenvat cred....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es used for providing the output services. The definition of input service definitely provides for availment of credit by such service provider. In the present case, the appellant has not challenged the position that the appellant has wrongly availed the service tax credit. It is also an apparent and admitted fact that the appellant has deposited an amount of Rs. 1,60,000/- on 16.04.2013 the wrong....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s. 76,711/- each has rightly been demanded vide the Order under challenge. 7. Perusal of record shows that it is appellant's own admission that he wrongly availed the credit. Thus, the demand confirmed for one year by the Order under challenge has no infirmity nor while limiting the same to normal period of one ear. It is also apparent from record that the appellant deposited the said wrongly a....