Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (12) TMI 1592

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Respondent : None ORDER The revenue appeals the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ("ITAT") which granted complete relief to the assesssee. The CIT (A) afforded partial relief by setting aside a disallowance in excess of Rs. 9 crores made by the Assessing Officer ("AO") under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT (A) had brought down the disallowance to a figu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) granted partial relief after analysing the decision but upholding the rejection of the disallowance by the AO offered by the assessee. The ITAT in the impugned judgment granted complete relief to the assessee on the strength of the two judgments of this Court, i.e., Joint Investment Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2015) 372 ITR 694 (Delhi) and Cheminvest Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax 378 ITR 33. This Cour....