2018 (8) TMI 1344

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Trial Court against the Revisionist in the present proceedings. The Trial Court having examined the case rendered its judgment coming to the conclusion that in view of the clear, cogent and consistent evidence adduced by the complainant as well as the documentary evidence and sufficiently proved before this Court the Respondent has been able to prove his case against the Revisionist under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (N.I. Act). The Revisionist preferred an Appeal before the Court of the Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.05 of 2013. The Learned Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 27.06.2015 would come to the conclusion that the judgment and order on sentence dated 24.06.2008 and 25.06.2008 respectively passed by the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....evisionist. The next document sought to be relied upon by the Respondent is a notarised and attested copy of a vernacular document from the State of Rajasthan which purports to be a sale deed entered between the Respondent as well as the said Amar Singh Singhi as the seller and Sant Kumar and Narendra Kumar as the buyer clearly mentioning therein that the sale deed is being executed by the Special Power of Attorney holder Radhey Shyam who is the Revisionist in the present case. The sale deed prima-facie reflects that it pertains to the same lands to which the present dispute relates. The sale deed is dated 03.11.1998. The next two documents sought to be relied upon are the land records (jamabandi) of the District Churu. The purported land r....