Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (8) TMI 1320

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') came to be issued on 30.03.2015 to the assessee on the ground that he had spent an amount of Rs. 58,77,000/- in the marriage of his daughter while income return filed by him was only of Rs. 1,05,850/-. The assessee filed its reply dated 27.04.2015 stating that original return may be treated to be his return filed in response to notice under Section 148 of the Act. In the assessment order passed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Alwar (for short 'the ITO') on 08.03.2016, addition of Rs. 58,02,000/-was made on account of unexplained marriage expenses. The ITO also noted that the assessee had received an amount of Rs. 30,00,000/- as advance against land and an amount of Rs. 41,52,255/- as un....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the ground that the filing of confirmation and the fact that money had been received from banking channels was not enough to discharge initial onus cast upon the assesee. Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, learned counsel for the appellant argued that the ITAT erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 11,10,000/- doubting the explanation of the assessee that the source of the amount was a gold brick given to the assessee's wife by her father-in-law, which was utilised to meet the expenses of the marriage. The occasion being the marriage of their daughter, the assessee's wife was also the parent of their daughter and had the social obligation to share in the expenses of her daughter's marriage. It is argued that the assessee had filed an affidavit to c....