Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (8) TMI 1139

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Agarwal For the Respondent : S.C.,Piyush Agarwal ORDER Heard learned counsel for the appellant Sri Suyash Agarwal and Sri Manish Goyal learned counsel for the department. As the controversy involved in both these appeals is identical, the same is being decided by a common judgment and order treating the Income Tax Appeal no.334 of 2016 as the leading case. The Income Tax Appeal no.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n previous years?" The Assessing Officer has sought to make an addition towards the bagasse upon examining and comparing the production of bagasse in another sugar factory. The C.I.T. in appeal while examining the material on record, came to the conclusion that the Assessing Officer had failed to take into account the factors affecting the recovery of bagasse while making the assessment. The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ks of accounts. The tribunal without going into the reasoning adopted by the C.I.T. had acquiesced with the Assessing Officer. However upon examining the material on record, we do find that the addition has been made simply on account of recoveries made by another sugar factory. The assessee on the other hand states that it did produce the material before the Assessing officer to show what reco....