2000 (11) TMI 46

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that this is a case of mistake sought to be rectified under section 13 whereas the Income-tax Officer has only treated it as giving effect to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's order and applying rule 2?" The real question to be decided is as to whether the order made by the Income-tax Officer, after the matter has be....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 1970, had determined the capital as Rs. 1,54,74,296. While doing so, he had allowed the assessee's claim that the advance tax paid and the tax deducted at source are not to be deducted. He revised his view after the matter was sent back by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and passed the second order on May 15, 1974, holding that those amounts should be deducted. The question now for consider....