2018 (8) TMI 724
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... for the Respondent in both the Appeals. P.C: These two Appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), challenge the order dated 30th June, 2010 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The common impugned order dated 30th June, 2010 disposes of the Appeals for Assessment Years 2003-04 and 2004-05. 2 Both these Appeals were admitted on 5th January, 2012 on ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Unilever Pvt. Ltd., 394 ITR 73. The aforesaid decision has been followed by this Court in Revenue's appeal on an identical question in CIT v/s. M/s. Arch Fine Chemicals (P) Ltd., (Income Tax Appeal No.1037 of 2014) dismissed on 6th December, 2016, CIT v/s. Bajaj Hindustan Ltd., (Income Tax Appeal Nos. 134, 135, 136, 140, 141 and 148 of 2016) a common order dated 28th February, 2018 dismissed ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ying upon the decision of the Gujarat High Court in DCIT v/s. General Motors India Pvt. Ltd., 354 ITR 244 and the Circular dated 22nd November, 2001 issued by the Central Board for Direct Taxes. Thus, the order admitting an Appeal, cannot be considered similar to a speaking order which has finally disposed of the Appeal. At the time of admission, no concluding view is taken. 7. It was next submit....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI