2018 (8) TMI 621

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er: S K Mohanty Heard both sides and perused the records. 2. Denial of refund benefit in respect of Service Tax paid on outdoor catering service is the subject matter of present dispute. The appellant in this case, had filed the refund application under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, claiming refund of Service Tax amount of Rs. 4,56,475/- paid by the service provider. Such appl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on dated 20.06.2012. The appellant has relied on the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad-I Vs. Ferromatik Milacron India Ltd. - 2011 (21) STR 8 (Guj.) and also the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Nagpur Vs. Relpol Plastic Products Ltd. - 2016 (42) STR 867 (Tri.-Mumbai), to state th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....amount of Service Tax paid by the appellant during the disputed period had also been deposited by such service provider in the Central Government account. Since such service provider has not served any food or beverages in a restaurant, eating joint or a mess and provided altogether a different taxable service to the appellant within its factory premises, the condition no. 19 prescribed in the not....