Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (8) TMI 577

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i Patel, Advocate for the respondent ORDER P. C. 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges the order dated 23rd April, 2015 passed by the Income-Tax Settlement Commission (the Commission). The impugned order dated 23rd April, 2015 has been passed under Section 245(D)(4) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). 2. The challenge to the impugned order dated....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the party, the Court may entertain a writ petition . However, the same is inter-alia to be examined in the context of the legislation under which the order is passed. Therefore, keeping the above broad parameters in mind, we shall examine the reason for the delay. 4. Mr. Mohanty, Learned Counsel appearing in support of the petition, submits that, this delay on the part of the petitioners was e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s of the Commission, which according to them, is without jurisdiction and/or contrary to the Statute. This not taking action is evidence of negligence or caring less about this issue. The extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction is to be exercised only in case of parties whose conduct would evidence that the party was serious about the challenge and acted expeditiously to set right an injustice perceived ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and Others V/s. Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore, (1988) 2 Supreme Court Cases 142, (ii) State of U.P. and Others Versus. Harish Chandra and Others, (1996) 9 Supreme Court Cases 309 and (iii) State of Haryana Versus. Chandra Mani and Others, (1996) 3 Supreme Court Cases 132 will not apply to the present facts. In all the above cases, the Parliament/Legislature had provided for Appeals u....