Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (8) TMI 567

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., JC (AR) for the Respondent ORDER Per Bench Brief facts are that the appellants had filed refund claim before the adjudicating authority who rejected the same on the ground that the Bill of Entry was not reassessed for arriving at the quantum of refund. In appeal, Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the same. Hence the appellant is before this Tribunal. 2. On behalf of the appellant, ld. counsel Ms....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the issue whether the appellant can claim refund without challenging the assessment is already settled by the decision relied by the ld. counsel for the appellant. This Tribunal in the case of Fresenius Medical Care India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs - 2018 (7) TMI 103 - CESTAT Chennai has also relied upon the decision in the case of Micromax Informatics Ltd. - 2016 (335) ELT 446 (Del.) a....