2017 (7) TMI 1201

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... D.R. ORDER Per Justice Dr. Satish Chandra: The present appeal is filed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 230/2012 dated 26.11.2012. The disputed period is April 2001 to February 2002. 2. The brief facts of the case are that during the period under consideration, the appellant was engaged in the manufacture of wash powder (Amla and Shikakai). The appellant claimed that this is a medical preparat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....upreme Court observed that : 4. In coming to the conclusion that all the six products were classifiable under preparation for use on the hair, the Tribunal held that except for certain letters from doctors, the appellants had not produced any evidence to show that the products were prescribed by Medical Practitioners as medicines for various diseases. The second basis of the Tribunal's conclusio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... been tested on patients in controlled situations or that the outcome had not been tested for effectiveness. This would be particularly true in the cases where the products are claimed to be based on traditional ayurvedic formulae 10. By following the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, we find no reason to interfere with the order passed by the lower authority pertaining to the second....