Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (8) TMI 238

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent ORDER Per : P. ANJANI KUMAR M/s. United Galva Pvt. Ltd. (the appellants) were engaged in manufacture of excisable goods. The Department alleged that during the period from December 2006 to February 2007, the appellants have availed the CENVAT Credit of the duty paid on the inputs viz., H.R. Coils, Zinc and LPG Gas for the clearance of 45.956 MT of Hot Dipped Galvanized Steel coils ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... on 08.01.2008 covering a period from December 2006 to February 2007 and hence was time-barred; the purchased C.R. coil falling under Ch. H. 72091890 and after galvanization, the product is cleared under chapter heading 72104100; as there is change in the chapter heading and the character of the goods, the process is a manufacture; the Rules of CENVAT Credit 2004 clearly states that CENVAT Credit ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nufacture. However, none appeared for the appellants. 3. The Authorized Representative has reiterated the findings of OIA and OIO. 4. Heard both sides and perused the records of the case. 5. We find that CBEC vide Circular No. 19/19/1994-CX dated 09.02.1994 has clarified that galvanization does not amount to manufacture within the meaning of Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944 as held by C....