Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2001 (7) TMI 91

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arent on record?" The facts of the case are as follows: For the relevant assessment years, the assessee-firm applied for registration under section 185(1)(b) of the Act. Registration was refused by the Assessing Officer and for all these years, the assessee was an unregistered firm. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer issued notice under section 154 of the Act stating that a mistake was committed by the assessee in not assessing the respondent/assessee under section 183(b) of the Act. An objection was filed to the petition by the assessee. It was also rejected. Against that order, the assessee filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), after hearing both sides, allowed th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r section 154 of the Act was issued. The question before us is whether the exercise of power under section 154 is valid or not. Section 154 of the Act states that with a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record an income-tax authority referred to in section 116 may amend any order passed by it under the provisions of the Act. So the exercise should be to rectify any mistake apparent from the record. It is not the case that the Assessing Officer wanted to assess the assessee under section 183(b) of the Act and that it was by a mistake that it was not done. The only case is that he failed to apply under section 183(b) of the Act earlier. As has been repeatedly held by courts, it is not sufficient, if there is merely a mistake i....