2018 (7) TMI 1022

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....  O R D E R CM No.26361/2018 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. 2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 6956/2018 & CM No.26362/2018(stay) 1. This writ petition has been filed by persons who were the directors in a company incorporated under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 1956. 2. Apart from these companies, these petitioners have stated i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....here. Apart from the disqualification under Section 164(2)(a), the writ petitioner has stated that in purported exercise of power under Section 248(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, the Registrar of Companies has additionally struck off the name of the said company from the Register of Companies. 6. The writ petitioners have raised several questions of fact and law challenging these acts and order....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(Central)-I, New Delhi v. Vatika Township Pvt. Ltd. and another pronouncement reported at (2018) SCC OnLine SC 59 Commissioner of Income Tax 5 Mumbai v. M/s Essar Teleholdings Ltd. through its Manager which relies on Vatika (supra). 8. Drawing our attention to the mandatory requirement under Section 248(1), upon the Registrar of Companies to send a notice to the company and all directors of the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....enied that the issues raised in this writ petition require adjudication and are of grave importance so far as the working of the spirit, intendment and object of the Companies Act, 2013, more specifically the manner in which the respondents would operate Sections 164 and 248 of the enactment. 11. Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Gaurang Kanth, ld. CGSC accepts notice on behalf of the respon....