Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (4) TMI 1369

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Tribunal has dismissed the appeals preferred by the Department. 3. This Court while admitting the appeals framed the following substantial questions of law:- Appeal No. 363/2011 "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the ITAT was justified in law in holding that the payments made by the assessee were not liable to be deducted at source u/s 194C of the Income Tax Act, 1961?" Appeal No. 563/2011 Whether Tribunal was justified in law in directing deletion of interest payable under Section 201 (1A) of the Income Tax Act by the assessee when according to the Revenue, payments in question attracts the provisions of Section 194C of the Act. 4. Counsel for the appellant contended that even if....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1972 (F. No. 275/9/72-ITJ), No. 93, dated 26th September, 1972 (F. No. 275/100/72-ITJ), and No. 108, dated 20th March, 1973 (F. No. 131(9)/ 73-TPL), in this regard. 4. Some of the issues raised in the above-mentioned circulars need to be reviewed in the light of the judgment dated March 23, 1993, delivered by the Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No. 2860(NT) of 1979- Associated Cement Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1993] 201 ITR 435. 5. The Supreme Court has held that ". . . there is nothing in the sub-section which could make us hold that the contract to carry out a work or the contract to supply labour to carry out a work should be confined to ' works contract ' . . .". Their Lordships have further held that " ' Any work ' means....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing guidelines in regard to the applicability of the provisions of section 194C:- (i) The provisions of section 194C shall apply to all types of contracts for carrying out any work including transport contracts, service contracts, advertisement contracts, broadcasting contracts, telecasting contracts, labour contracts, materials contracts and works contracts. (ii) No deduction at source under section 194C shall be required to be made if the consideration for the contract does not exceed the prescribed amount which at present is Rs. 10,000 (ten thousand only). (iii) The provisions of section 194C would not apply in relation to payments made for hiring or renting of equipments, etc. (iv) The provisions of s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es to the Government or such person only after such article or thing is delivered, the contract will be a contract for sale and as such outside the purview of this section. (c) In State of Himachal Pradesh v. Associated Hotels of India Ltd. [1972] 29 STC 474, the Supreme Court observed that where the principal objective of work undertaken by the payee of the price is not the transfer of a chattel qua chattel, contract is of work and labour. The test is whether or not the work and labour bestowed end in anything that can properly become the subject of sale ; neither the ownership of the materials nor the value of skill and labour as compared with the value of the materials is conclusive although such matters may be taken in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(x) The percentage deduction prescribed in law is with reference to the amount of payment and not " income comprised in the payment ". The person responsible for making payment, therefore, is not required to estimate the income comprised in the payment. (xi) In a case where advance payments are made during the execution of a contract and such payments are to be adjusted at the time of final settlement of accounts, tax will have to be deducted at the time of making advance payments if the total payment is likely to exceed Rs. 10,000. (xii) Where any contractor is the recipient of any amount under a contract but the income of the recipient is not subject to income-tax, such contractor may obtain a certificate from his Assess....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the principal contract is for work and labour and not a contract for sale of materials. 9. Board's Circular No. 86, dated 29th May, 1972, and No. 93, dated 26th September, 1972, and para 11 of Circular No. 108, dated 20th March, 1973, are hereby withdrawn. Board's Circular No. 558, dated 28th March, 1990, is reiterated. 10. It is clarified that this circular explaining the provisions of section 194C will apply with effect from 1st April, 1994. Tax deductions made in accordance with Circulars Nos. 86, 93 and 108 up to 31st March, 1994, will be regarded as compliance of the provisions of section 194C." 6. He also relied upon the judgment of Karnataka High Court in CIT Vs. Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd., (2....