Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (7) TMI 772

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eir CENVAT Credit records, in the subsequent Financial Year 2010-11, as their opening Balance. Also, they have availed credit of Rs. 5,74,902/- during the Financial Year 2010-11, even though they were availing benefit of SSI exemption under Notification 08/2003-CE dated 01/03/2003. Alleging the aforesaid credit amount is inadmissible, SCN was issued for recovery of the same and on adjudication, it was confirmed with interest and penalty. Aggrieved by the said order, they filed appeal before Ld. Commissioner (Appeals), who inturn rejected the Appeal, hence, the present Appeal. 3. Ld. Chartered Accountant for the appellant submits that they had availed SSI Exemption under Notification 8/2003-CE dated 01/03/2003 on the aggregate value of cl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erated the findings of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals). 5. I find that the short issue involved in the present appeal is: whether the appellant had correctly availed CENVAT Credit of Rs. 5,30,300/- lying in balance as on 31/03/2010 and also credit of Rs. 5,74,902/- availed during the Financial Year 2010-11. It is not in dispute that the appellant manufacture excisable goods and avail benefit of SSI exemption under Notification 08/2003CE dt.31.3.2003 for the first aggregate clearance of Rs. 150.00lakhs . Also, they have manufactured excisable goods affixing the brand name of others for which the said exemption Notification was not availed and duty was paid by them. Also, it is not in dispute that they availed credit on the common inputs us....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e year 2010-11. Also, it is not contested by the appellant that in the Financial Year 2010-11, they had availed SSI exemption for clearance of their own goods up to the aggregate clearance of Rs. 150.00 lakhs and also availed credit on the inputs used in the manufacture of said exempted goods. It is their contention that since they complied with the Provisions of Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 hence, the credit cannot be denied to them even though the inputs used in the manufacture of goods up to the value of Rs. 150.00 Lakhs, had been exempted. 7. Clause- 2(d)(iii) of the Notification 08/2003 reads as follows: (iii) the manufacturer shall not avail the credit of duty on inputs under rule 3 or rule 11 of the CENVAT Credit Rule....