AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2018 (7) TMI 672
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... AC (AR) for the Appellant None for the Respondent ORDER Per Bench Department is aggrieved by the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) who set aside the demand, interest and penalties. 2. Brief facts are that the respondents are 100% EOU and manufacturers of bulk drugs falling under Chapter 29. On perusal of records, it was noticed that they had cleared the goods Danazol in DT....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....taken up for disposal after hearing the ld. AR and on perusal of records. 6. The demand has been raised denying the benefit of Notification No.21/2002-Cus. alleging that the respondents have not followed the condition covered under Entry No.80(B) of Notification and that the drug "Danazol" bulk drug would fall under 80(b). The bulk drug imported by the respondent is not eligible for concessiona....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ll within the coverage of 'drugs specified in List 3' and consequently the benefit of Sl. No. 80(A) would be admissible to them in relation to BCD. It would follow that, insofar as CVD is concerned, the benefit of Sl. No. 47(A) of the Central Excise Notification would be available to the goods. We have taken this view upon strict interpretation of the language used in the description of goods unde....