2018 (7) TMI 607

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Jindal The Appellant is in appeal against an impugned order wherein suo moto Cenvat credit taken by the Appellant has been denied. 2. The facts of the case are that the Appellant cleared goods and paid the duty thereon. Due to escalation in the price of goods, the Appellant raised supplementary invoices and debited the duty in cenvat credit account. But the buyer of the goods did not agree with ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ions made by both the sides and perused the records. 4. An identical issue came up before this Tribunal in the case of Pushp Enterprises vs. CCE, Jaipur I [2015 (322) ELT 728 (Tri-Del)] wherein the facts of the case are as under : "2. The appellant is manufacturer of bearing component and supplying the same to M/s. SKF Ltd. They are having an agreement as the actual selling price of the goods we....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the Central Excise Act, 1944, A show cause notice was issued to the appellant to deny Cenvat credit taken suo moto and consequently to demand duty along with interest and for imposition of penalty. The matter was adjudicated and demand along with interest was confirmed and penalty of Rs. 50,000/- was also imposed." And this Tribunal observed as under: "6. In this case, the short issue to be ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....torola India Pvt. Ltd. (supra) came to the conclusion that suo moto credit can be taken if duty is paid twice as excess duty paid is not a duty and same is deposited. In these circumstances, as the decision of Sopariwala Exports Pvt. Ltd. (supra) has been delivered by this Tribunal based upon the decision of Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Motorola India Pvt. Ltd., therefore, I hold....